San Rock Art in Drakensberg, SA

I was lucky enough to visit three impressive San Rock Art Sites in the World Heritage uKhahlamba- Drakensberg Park in South Africa. The paintings were created by indigenous San peoples, hunter-gatherers who lived in the area for thousands of years until their encounter with Zulu tribes and white settlers from Europe. After being forced to withdraw from the area, San culture disappeared from the Drakensberg at the end of the 19th century leaving behind their legacy through astonishing rock art in rock shelters and caves.

20180708_12455320180708_132251

The paintings mainly represent hunters, animals, shamans and half human, half animal hybrids. There are 600 rock art sites documented in the Drakensberg mountains, some of which are open to the public, making it a unique destination to visit.

20180708_133132

20180708_103746

 

First micromorphology sample of the season!

We are currently in South Africa, excavating the Umhlatuzana Rockshelter site in Kwazulu-Natal.  Although the full micromorphological sampling will be done at the end of the excavation, I could not resist and sampled an impressive hearth feature in the top Holocene layers.  You can see the nice stratigraphy of the hearth and the transition from organic-rich to ash layers. The sediments are highly bioturbated with animal burrows visible to the naked eye.

It was also a great opportunity to test out how Kubiena sampling tins work in our context. The sampling was successful with a small, almost inevitable, profile collapse.

 

Bonus video

Geoarchaeologist Dr. Karkanas extracting a micromorphological sample for the study of paleosols in Hungary’s Koros River Valley

Terra Rossa vs red sediments

Terra rossa is a soil type produced after the weathering of limestone and is quite common across the Mediterranean region. Because of its name, the red soil, people tend to generalize the terra rossa term and use it for every quaternary red clayish deposit regardless of the processes apply to soil formation.

In geoarchaeology it is very important to distinguish red sediments from paleosols as the different formation processes between them result to different information and, thus, archaeological interpretation. The necessity for a clear definition when it comes to paleosols has been stressed out from very early by Valentine and Dalrymple (1976). As it has been pointed out by van Andel (1998), paleosols represent useful stratigraphic tools: former land surfaces possibly relating with human activity. On the other hand, red sediments are ‘the oxidized residue of limestone weathering that once blanketed large regions where limestone dominates the bedrock’ (van Andel 1998, 361). However, van Andel makes a further distinction for terra rossa soils: the primary terra rossa and the re-deposited terra rossa on karst environment. Due to the existing climate, soil formation on limestone bedrocks within the Mediterranean area is very slow; because of slope wash, it is very difficult for the soil to remain in situ. In the case of a karstic peneplain, this primary terra rossa can be captured and form deposits of several meters; on this redeposited sediment, new soils can be formed.

terra rossa

The figure shows the evolution of loutses and poljes on a karstic peneplain (van Andel 1998, 378): ‘Time 1: Terra rossa mantle of a karstic peneplain washes into shallow surface depressions of the karst called loutses. Time 2: Compressive tectonics creates fault-bound, elongated basins of internal drainage called poljes which fill with redeposited terra rossa. Time 3: Continued uplift raises polje and streams cut into the deposits by headward erosion’.

 

But why do these matter?

 

The importance of terra rossa in archaeology lies to the fact that it is associated with many prehistoric sites in the Mediterranean area. Dating the aeolian silt that is included in the redeposited terra rossa with luminescence methods can also be possible (van Andel 1998). The type of formation associated with the archaeological finds will include different environmental information: in the case of primary terra rossa the soil were most probable exposed for a long time which indicates a low-resources dry environment. On the other hand, redeposited terra rossa yields wet environment abundant in food resources which could be the reason for an extensive human presence.

 

 

References:

Valentine, K. W., Dalrymple, J., 1976. Quaternary Buried Paleosols: A Critical Review. Quaternary Research, 6,209-222.

van Andel, T., 1998, Paleosols, Red Sediments, and the Old Stone Age in Greece. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, 13/4, 361–390.